1.1 Time response of continuous time first-order linear systems
Concepts analyzed in the chapter
Modeling of linear time invariant dynamic systems from first-order linear differential equation.
Obtaining the transfer function of a first-order system from a linear differential equation.
Time response of a first-order linear system for a step input (step response).
Concept of static gain and its effect on the system time response for a step input.
Concept of time constant and its effect on the system time response for a step input.
Stability analysis of first-order linear systems.
Theory
This card analyzes the continuous time response of linear time invariant first-order systems without zeros. These systems represent the simplest dynamics, as derived from first-order differential equations of the form:
(1.1)
In expression (1.1), and represent the system output and input respectively. The representative transfer function can be written as:
(1.2)
wherein the denominator polynomial is called characteristic polynomial , whose only root (solution of the characteristic equation ) is called pole of the transfer function, placed on . The two parameters that characterize the transfer function of a first-order system are:
: Static gain or canonical gain of the system.
: Time constant.
The time response is linked to a certain excitation signal, traditionally the step (, with in the case of unit step). Therefore, using the inverse Laplace transform (), one can obtain the time response of a first-order system when the input signal is a step. Using the expression of the output in the Laplace domain:
if a partial-fraction expansion is used:
the inverse Laplace transform of each one of the terms can be used, providing the time response when the input signal is a step:
(1.3)
This time response can also be obtained by solving the differential equation with a step shape input:
The behavior of the output of the system depends on the sign of :
If , the output is bounded () and therefore it is said that the system is stable.
If , the output is unbounded for nonzero values of and therefore it is said that the system is unstable.
As a generalization of this result, it is stated that a necessary and sufficient condition for a system to be stable is that all poles of its transfer function have negative real parts. In this case we also speak of asymptotic stability, since the output tends to a steady-state value asymptotically.
Note that if the system is not a dynamic one and the relationship between the output and the input is determined by the static gain of the system, , which corresponds to the ratio between the value taken by the system output in steady-state () and the value of the input also in steady-state, as zero initial conditions are assumed. Applying the final value theorem of the Laplace transform to equation (1.3), we have:
As shown in the above equation, the static gain can be obtained by selecting in the transfer function, .
The designation of time constant, , stems from the fact that this parameter is indicative of the speed of the transient response of the system. The higher is, the slower the transient response of the system, that will take more time to reach its final value. Thus, according to equation (1.3):
For , the output of the system corresponds to , which is approximately 63 of the final value, .
For , the system output corresponding to 95 of the final value, .
For , the output of the system is around 98 of the final value (), which is considered the settling time for first-order systems (the response remains within 2 of the final value). According to equation (1.3), the steady state is achieved mathematically in infinite time, so that in practice it is considered that the system output is in steady-state when it reaches 98 of the final value, equal to four time constants.
Another important feature is that the slope of the time response of the system in is (where is the instant the step input is applied to the system); see Figure 1.3.
Fig. 1.3 Parameters characterizing the time response and the complex plane representation of a first-order system
A particular case study of a first-order system called integrator is that having its pole at the origin of the -plane () and described by:
(1.4)
This system would be equivalent to a first-order one with a very large time constant ().
References
Bolzern, P., R. Scattolini and N. Schiavoni. Fundamentos de control automático (Fundamentals of automatic control). Mc Graw Hill, ISBN: 978-84-481-6640-3. Chapter 4, section 4, paragraph 3, pages 103-104, 2009.
Franklin, G. F., J. D. Powell and A. Emani-Naeni. Feedback control of dynamic systems. 6th edition. Pearson. ISBN: 978-0-13-500150-9. Chapter 3, section 3, pages 126-128, 2010.
Golnaraghi, F. and B.C. Kuo. Automatic control systems. 9th edition. John Wiley Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0470-04896-2. Chapter 5, section 5, pages 274-275, 2010.
Ogata, K. Modern control engineering. 5th edition. Pearson (International Edition), ISBN: 978-0-13-713337-6. Chapter 5, section 2, pages 171-174, 2010.
Shahian, B. and M. Hassul. Control system design using Matlab. First edition. Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-174061-X. Chapter 1, section 5, paragraph 1, pages 10-11, 1993.